You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0636-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marguerite C. Sendall, Laura K. McCosker, Alison Brodie, Melissa Hill, Phil Crane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 7% |
| Zambia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 72 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,539,531
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#548
of 2,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,889
of 447,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#27
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.