↓ Skip to main content

Flightless birds are not neuroanatomical analogs of non-avian dinosaurs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
84 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flightless birds are not neuroanatomical analogs of non-avian dinosaurs
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12862-018-1312-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Eugenia Leone Gold, Akinobu Watanabe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#728,622
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#143
of 3,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,264
of 446,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.