↓ Skip to main content

Potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, December 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. O'Keeffe, M. Kelly, E. O'Herlihy, P.W. O'Toole, P.M. Kearney, S. Timmons, E. O'Shea, C. Stanton, M. Hickson, Y. Rolland, C. Sulmont Rossé, S. Issanchou, I. Maitre, M. Stelmach-Mardas, G. Nagel, M. Flechtner-Mors, M. Wolters, A. Hebestreit, L.C.P.G.M. De Groot, O. van de Rest, R. Teh, M.A. Peyron, D. Dardevet, I. Papet, K. Schindler, M. Streicher, G. Torbahn, E. Kiesswetter, M. Visser, D. Volkert, E.M. O'Connor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 318 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 19%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 17 5%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 86 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 67 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 19%
Psychology 18 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 106 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,510,452
of 18,934,527 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#675
of 2,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,335
of 406,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#22
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,934,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.