You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Associations between general practice characteristics with use of urgent referrals for suspected cancer and endoscopies: a cross-sectional ecological study
Family Practice, December 2018
Silvia C Mendonca, Gary A Abel, Carolynn Gildea, Sean McPhail, Michael D Peake, Greg Rubin, Hardeep Singh, Willie Hamilton, Fiona M Walter, Martin O Roland, Georgios Lyratzopoulos
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||50%|
|Members of the public||3||38%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||14%|
|Student > Master||4||14%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||7%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||24%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||7%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Family Practice
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 434,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Family Practice
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.