↓ Skip to main content

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Overview of attention for article published in this source, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
624 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nieboer, Theodoor E, Johnson, Neil, Lethaby, Anne, Tavender, Emma, Curr, Elizabeth, Garry, Ray, van Voorst, Sabine, Mol, Ben Willem J, Kluivers, Kirsten B

Abstract

The three approaches to hysterectomy for benign disease are abdominal hysterectomy (AH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Laparoscopic hysterectomy has three further subdivisions depending on the part of the procedure performed laparoscopically.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 17 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#878,775
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from this source
#1,801
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,518
of 258,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#98
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.