↓ Skip to main content

Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J King, Anupa Shah, Eleni Nikita, Kuang Hu, Caroline A Mulvaney, Richard Stead, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 56 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 64 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,559,093
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,132
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,494
of 444,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.