You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minimum Information about an Uncultivated Virus Genome (MIUViG)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.4306 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Roux, Evelien M Adriaenssens, Bas E Dutilh, Eugene V Koonin, Andrew M Kropinski, Mart Krupovic, Jens H Kuhn, Rob Lavigne, J Rodney Brister, Arvind Varsani, Clara Amid, Ramy K Aziz, Seth R Bordenstein, Peer Bork, Mya Breitbart, Guy R Cochrane, Rebecca A Daly, Christelle Desnues, Melissa B Duhaime, Joanne B Emerson, François Enault, Jed A Fuhrman, Pascal Hingamp, Philip Hugenholtz, Bonnie L Hurwitz, Natalia N Ivanova, Jessica M Labonté, Kyung-Bum Lee, Rex R Malmstrom, Manuel Martinez-Garcia, Ilene Karsch Mizrachi, Hiroyuki Ogata, David Páez-Espino, Marie-Agnès Petit, Catherine Putonti, Thomas Rattei, Alejandro Reyes, Francisco Rodriguez-Valera, Karyna Rosario, Lynn Schriml, Frederik Schulz, Grieg F Steward, Matthew B Sullivan, Shinichi Sunagawa, Curtis A Suttle, Ben Temperton, Susannah G Tringe, Rebecca Vega Thurber, Nicole S Webster, Katrine L Whiteson, Steven W Wilhelm, K Eric Wommack, Tanja Woyke, Kelly C Wrighton, Pelin Yilmaz, Takashi Yoshida, Mark J Young, Natalya Yutin, Lisa Zeigler Allen, Nikos C Kyrpides, Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 188 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 26% |
| France | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Austria | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 51% |
| Scientists | 87 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 462 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 21% |
| Researcher | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 61 | 13% |
| Unknown | 122 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 108 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 6% |
| Engineering | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 145 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#242,986
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#516
of 8,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,894
of 434,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#9
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.