↓ Skip to main content

Root endophytes and invasiveness: no difference between native and non‐native Phragmites in the Great Lakes Region

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Root endophytes and invasiveness: no difference between native and non‐native Phragmites in the Great Lakes Region
Published in
Ecosphere, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2526
Authors

Wesley A. Bickford, Deborah E. Goldberg, Kurt P. Kowalski, Donald R. Zak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 42%
Environmental Science 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Computer Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,847,452
of 14,465,534 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#951
of 1,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,104
of 329,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#32
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,465,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.