↓ Skip to main content

How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Political Analysis, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 408)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
250 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice
Published in
Political Analysis, December 2018
DOI 10.1017/pan.2018.46
Authors

Jens Hainmueller, Jonathan Mummolo, Yiqing Xu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 248 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 30%
Student > Master 26 10%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Professor 17 7%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 30 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 143 57%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 27 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 43 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#129,840
of 16,324,751 outputs
Outputs from Political Analysis
#4
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,845
of 390,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Analysis
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,324,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them