You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Two Bioceramic Sealers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Endodontics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christin Michelle Giacomino, James A. Wealleans, Natalia Kuhn, Anibal Diogenes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 42% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 120 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endodontics
#1,066
of 2,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,179
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endodontics
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.