↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Aoyama, Susumu Kunisawa, Kiyohide Fushimi, Teiji Sawa, Yuichi Imanaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,000,271
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#546
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,501
of 435,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.