↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6
Authors

Takeshi Aoyama, Susumu Kunisawa, Kiyohide Fushimi, Teiji Sawa, Yuichi Imanaka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,690,175
of 14,056,657 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#260
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,123
of 367,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#35
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,056,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.