↓ Skip to main content

Effect of biostimulation on the distribution and composition of the microbial community of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated landfill soil during bioremediation

Overview of attention for article published in Geoderma, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of biostimulation on the distribution and composition of the microbial community of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated landfill soil during bioremediation
Published in
Geoderma, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.12.001
Authors

Eman Koshlaf, Esmaeil Shahsavari, Nagalakshmi Haleyur, A. Mark Osborn, Andrew S. Ball

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Engineering 5 18%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,972,174
of 13,292,231 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#564
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,842
of 329,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#23
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,292,231 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.