You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of biostimulation on the distribution and composition of the microbial community of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated landfill soil during bioremediation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geoderma, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.12.001 |
| Authors |
Eman Koshlaf, Esmaeil Shahsavari, Nagalakshmi Haleyur, A. Mark Osborn, Andrew S. Ball |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#1,765
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,620
of 367,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#56
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.