You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Latin Americans show wide-spread Converso ancestry and imprint of local Native ancestry on physical appearance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07748-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan-Camilo Chacón-Duque, Kaustubh Adhikari, Macarena Fuentes-Guajardo, Javier Mendoza-Revilla, Victor Acuña-Alonzo, Rodrigo Barquera, Mirsha Quinto-Sánchez, Jorge Gómez-Valdés, Paola Everardo Martínez, Hugo Villamil-Ramírez, Tábita Hünemeier, Virginia Ramallo, Caio C. Silva de Cerqueira, Malena Hurtado, Valeria Villegas, Vanessa Granja, Mercedes Villena, René Vásquez, Elena Llop, José R. Sandoval, Alberto A. Salazar-Granara, Maria-Laura Parolin, Karla Sandoval, Rosenda I. Peñaloza-Espinosa, Hector Rangel-Villalobos, Cheryl A. Winkler, William Klitz, Claudio Bravi, Julio Molina, Daniel Corach, Ramiro Barrantes, Verónica Gomes, Carlos Resende, Leonor Gusmão, Antonio Amorim, Yali Xue, Jean-Michel Dugoujon, Pedro Moral, Rolando González-José, Lavinia Schuler-Faccini, Francisco M. Salzano, Maria-Cátira Bortolini, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Giovanni Poletti, Carla Gallo, Gabriel Bedoya, Francisco Rothhammer, David Balding, Garrett Hellenthal, Andrés Ruiz-Linares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 19 | 11% |
| United States | 17 | 10% |
| Mexico | 13 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 7% |
| Colombia | 8 | 5% |
| France | 7 | 4% |
| Argentina | 6 | 4% |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 66% |
| Scientists | 52 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#235,995
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,409
of 58,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,870
of 446,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#90
of 1,301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.