↓ Skip to main content

Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011689.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou, Rebecca Man, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Myfanwy J Williams, Virginia Diaz, Julia Pasquale, Monica Chamillard, Mariana Widmer, Özge Tunçalp, G Justus Hofmeyr, Fernando Althabe, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel, Olufemi T Oladapo, Arri Coomarasamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Other 14 8%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 48 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#549,140
of 16,164,637 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,405
of 11,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,213
of 389,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,164,637 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.