↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance left ventricular strain in end-stage renal disease patients after kidney transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance left ventricular strain in end-stage renal disease patients after kidney transplantation
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12968-018-0504-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inna Y. Gong, Bandar Al-Amro, G. V. Ramesh Prasad, Philip W. Connelly, Rachel M. Wald, Ron Wald, Djeven P. Deva, Howard Leong-Poi, Michelle M. Nash, Weiqiu Yuan, Lakshman Gunaratnam, S. Joseph Kim, Charmaine E. Lok, Kim A. Connelly, Andrew T. Yan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,631,258
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#883
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,600
of 430,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.