↓ Skip to main content

Critical review: Grand challenges in assessing the adverse effects of contaminants of emerging concern on aquatic food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical review: Grand challenges in assessing the adverse effects of contaminants of emerging concern on aquatic food webs
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/etc.4290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Nilsen, Kelly L. Smalling, Lutz Ahrens, Meritxell Gros, Karina S.B. Miglioranza, Yolanda Picó, Heiko L. Schoenfuss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,369,049
of 12,560,082 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#2,106
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,081
of 273,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,560,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.