You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teaching improvement science to paramedicine students: protocol for a systematic scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0910-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Pap, Louis Shabella, Alan J. Morrison, Paul M. Simpson, David M. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,333,324
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,286
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,887
of 437,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#74
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.