↓ Skip to main content

“She Was What They Call a ‘Pepe’”: Kinship Practice and Incest Codes in Late Colonial Guatemala

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family History, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“She Was What They Call a ‘Pepe’”: Kinship Practice and Incest Codes in Late Colonial Guatemala
Published in
Journal of Family History, December 2018
DOI 10.1177/0363199018818617
Authors

Sarah N. Saffa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,806,361
of 14,051,173 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family History
#88
of 163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,629
of 367,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family History
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 163 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them