Chapter title |
Hearing in Whales and Dolphins: Relevance and Limitations.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 98 |
Book title |
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_98 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2980-1, 978-1-4939-2981-8
|
Authors |
Aude F. Pacini, Paul E. Nachtigall, Pacini, Aude F., Nachtigall, Paul E. |
Editors |
Arthur N. Popper, Anthony Hawkins |
Abstract |
Understanding the hearing of marine mammals has been a priority to quantify and mitigate the impact of anthropogenic sound on these apex predators. Yet our knowledge of cetacean hearing is still limited to a few dozen species, therefore compromising any attempt to design adaptive management strategies. The use of auditory evoked potentials allows scientists to rapidly and noninvasively obtain the hearing data of species rarely available in captivity. Unfortunately, many practical and ethical reasons still limit the availability of large whales, thus restricting the possibility to effectively ensure that anthropogenic sounds have minimum effects on these species. The example of a recent Blainville's beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris) audiogram collected after a stranding indicated, for instance, very specialized hearing between 40 and 50 kHz, which corresponded to the frequency-modulated upsweep signals used by this species during echolocation. The methods used during a stranding event are presented along with the major difficulties that have slowed down the scientific community in measuring the audition of large whales and the potential value in obtaining such results when successful. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |