↓ Skip to main content

Enclosing the Gold-Mining Commons of Mongolia: The Vanishing Ninja and the Development Project as Resource

Overview of attention for article published in Current Anthropology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enclosing the Gold-Mining Commons of Mongolia: The Vanishing Ninja and the Development Project as Resource
Published in
Current Anthropology, December 2018
DOI 10.1086/700961
Authors

G. Munkherdene, David Sneath

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,361,020
of 12,417,146 outputs
Outputs from Current Anthropology
#364
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,856
of 215,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Anthropology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,417,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.