↓ Skip to main content

Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: A Critical View of Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: A Critical View of Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity
Chapter number 12
Book title
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation
Published by
Springer International Publishing, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_12
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-916147-1, 978-3-31-916148-8
Authors

Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes

Editors

Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%