↓ Skip to main content

Epistasis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Epistasis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Long-Term Selection Experiments: Epistasis and the Response to Selection
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Finding the Epistasis Needles in the Genome-Wide Haystack
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Biological Knowledge-Driven Analysis of Epistasis in Human GWAS with Application to Lipid Traits.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Epistasis for quantitative traits in Drosophila.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Epistasis in the risk of human neuropsychiatric disease.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 On the Partitioning of Genetic Variance with Epistasis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Measuring gene interactions.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Two Rules for the Detection and Quantification of Epistasis and Other Interaction Effects
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Direct Approach to Modeling Epistasis
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Capacitating Epistasis—Detection and Role in the Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Compositional Epistasis: An Epidemiologic Perspective
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification of Genome-Wide SNP-SNP and SNP-Clinical Boolean Interactions in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Epistasis Analysis Using Information Theory
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Genome-wide epistasis and pleiotropy characterized by the bipartite human phenotype network.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Network theory for data-driven epistasis networks.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Epistasis analysis using multifactor dimensionality reduction.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Epistasis Analysis Using ReliefF
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Epistasis analysis using artificial intelligence.
Attention for Chapter 3: Biological Knowledge-Driven Analysis of Epistasis in Human GWAS with Application to Lipid Traits.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biological Knowledge-Driven Analysis of Epistasis in Human GWAS with Application to Lipid Traits.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Epistasis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2155-3_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2154-6, 978-1-4939-2155-3
Authors

Li Ma, Alon Keinan, Andrew G Clark, Andrew G. Clark, Ma, Li, Keinan, Alon, Clark, Andrew G.

Abstract

While the importance of epistasis is well established, specific gene-gene interactions have rarely been identified in human genome-wide association studies (GWAS), mainly due to low power associated with such interaction tests. In this chapter, we integrate biological knowledge and human GWAS data to reveal epistatic interactions underlying quantitative lipid traits, which are major risk factors for coronary artery disease. To increase power to detect interactions, we only tested pairs of SNPs filtered by prior biological knowledge, including GWAS results, protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and pathway information. Using published GWAS and 9,713 European Americans (EA) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, we identified an interaction between HMGCR and LIPC affecting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. We then validated this interaction in additional multiethnic cohorts from ARIC, the Framingham Heart Study, and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Both HMGCR and LIPC are involved in the metabolism of lipids and lipoproteins, and LIPC itself has been marginally associated with HDL-C. Furthermore, no significant interaction was detected using PPI and pathway information, mainly due to the stringent significance level required after correcting for the large number of tests conducted. These results suggest the potential of biological knowledge-driven approaches to detect epistatic interactions in human GWAS, which may hold the key to exploring the role gene-gene interactions play in connecting genotypes and complex phenotypes in future GWAS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Student > Bachelor 8 27%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,384,336
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,867
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,662
of 352,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#479
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.