| Title |
Evaluating consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects on prey density using field time‐series data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.2583 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. A. Marino, S. D. Peacor, D. B. Bunnell, H. A. Vanderploeg, S. A. Pothoven, A. K. Elgin, J. R. Bence, J. Jiao, E. L. Ionides |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 21% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,239,967
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#4,959
of 6,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,088
of 354,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#82
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.