↓ Skip to main content

Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 157 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 165 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models: Characterization of iPS Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 166 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 167 Modeling Axonal Phenotypes with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 168 In Vitro Modeling of Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 169 Modeling Genomic Imprinting Disorders Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 170 Generation of Patient-Specific induced Pluripotent Stem Cell from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells by Sendai Reprogramming Vectors.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 171 Using Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Model Skeletal Diseases
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 172 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models: Generation and Characterization of Cardiac Cells.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 173 Generation of Cardiomyocytes from Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 178 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 179 A Doxycycline-Inducible System for Genetic Correction of iPSC Disease Models.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 194 Multisystemic Disease Modeling of Liver-Derived Protein Folding Disorders Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs).
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 195 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 196 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 204 Generation of Integration-Free Patient Specific iPS Cells Using Episomal Plasmids Under Feeder Free Conditions.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 205 Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using RNA-Based Sendai Virus System and Pluripotency Validation of the Resulting Cell Population.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 225 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 257 Directed Myogenic Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 258 Generation and Characterization of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Patients with mtDNA Mutations.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 267 Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 273 Generation and Characterization of Patient-Specific iPSC Model for Cardiovascular Disease.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 278 Transgene-Free Disease-Specific iPSC Generation from Fibroblasts and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models
Published by
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3034-0
ISBNs
978-1-4939-3033-3, 978-1-4939-3034-0
Authors

Nagy, András, Turksen, Kursad

Editors

Andras Nagy, Kursad Turksen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Engineering 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,279,481
of 16,307,759 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#158
of 9,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,558
of 347,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#28
of 1,152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,307,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.