You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? 1 , 2
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.115.120873 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kevin D Cashman, Kirsten G Dowling, Zuzana Škrabáková, Marcela Gonzalez-Gross, Jara Valtueña, Stefaan De Henauw, Luis Moreno, Camilla T Damsgaard, Kim F Michaelsen, Christian Mølgaard, Rolf Jorde, Guri Grimnes, George Moschonis, Christina Mavrogianni, Yannis Manios, Michael Thamm, Gert BM Mensink, Martina Rabenberg, Markus A Busch, Lorna Cox, Sarah Meadows, Gail Goldberg, Ann Prentice, Jacqueline M Dekker, Giel Nijpels, Stefan Pilz, Karin M Swart, Natasja M van Schoor, Paul Lips, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Vilmundur Gudnason, Mary Frances Cotch, Seppo Koskinen, Christel Lamberg-Allardt, Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu, Christopher T Sempos, Mairead Kiely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 25 | 19% |
United States | 12 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 7% |
Ireland | 5 | 4% |
Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
Finland | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
France | 2 | 1% |
India | 2 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 93 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 17% |
Scientists | 16 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,051 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 1041 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 152 | 14% |
Student > Master | 129 | 12% |
Researcher | 100 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 9% |
Other | 62 | 6% |
Other | 178 | 17% |
Unknown | 335 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 283 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 79 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 77 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 33 | 3% |
Other | 111 | 11% |
Unknown | 390 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#174,543
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#487
of 12,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,067
of 412,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#12
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.