↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Sacred Mountain of Varallo renaissance complex in Italy: damage analysis of decorated surfaces and structural supports

Overview of attention for article published in Meccanica, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Sacred Mountain of Varallo renaissance complex in Italy: damage analysis of decorated surfaces and structural supports
Published in
Meccanica, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11012-014-9905-1
Authors

Federico Accornero, Stefano Invernizzi, Giuseppe Lacidogna, Alberto Carpinteri

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,824,480
of 12,323,844 outputs
Outputs from Meccanica
#17
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,619
of 344,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meccanica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,323,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them