↓ Skip to main content

Pro-coagulant haemostatic factors for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in people without haemophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pro-coagulant haemostatic factors for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in people without haemophilia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010649.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jez Fabes, Susan J Brunskill, Nicola Curry, Carolyn Doree, Simon J Stanworth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,950,537
of 12,981,548 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,600
of 10,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,193
of 312,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,981,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.