↓ Skip to main content

A Functional Analysis of Visual and Verbal Symbols in Presidential Campaign Posters, 1828-2012

Overview of attention for article published in Presidential Studies Quarterly, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Functional Analysis of Visual and Verbal Symbols in Presidential Campaign Posters, 1828-2012
Published in
Presidential Studies Quarterly, December 2018
DOI 10.1111/psq.12503
Authors

William L. Benoit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,816,823
of 13,165,892 outputs
Outputs from Presidential Studies Quarterly
#202
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,259
of 322,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Presidential Studies Quarterly
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,165,892 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.