↓ Skip to main content

ECOOP 2012 – Object-Oriented Programming

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'ECOOP 2012 – Object-Oriented Programming'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 When Compilers Are Mirrors
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Extensibility for the Masses
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Extensions during Software Evolution: Do Objects Meet Their Promise?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 PQL: A Purely-Declarative Java Extension for Parallel Programming
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Is It Dangerous to Use Version Control Histories to Study Source Code Evolution?
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Evaluating the Design of the R Language
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 McSAF: A Static Analysis Framework for MATLAB
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Multiple Aggregate Entry Points for Ownership Types
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Inference and Checking of Object Ownership
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Object Initialization in X10
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Structured Aliasing
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Pause ’n’ Play: Formalizing Asynchronous C^\sharp
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Lightweight Polymorphic Effects
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Cloud Types for Eventual Consistency
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Lock Inference in the Presence of Large Libraries
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 An Analysis of the Mozilla Jetpack Extension Framework
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Smaller Footprint for Java Collections
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Enhancing JavaScript with Transactions
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 JavaScript as an Embedded DSL
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Correlation Tracking for Points-To Analysis of JavaScript
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Soundness of Object-Oriented Languages with Coinductive Big-Step Semantics
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Static Sessional Dataflow
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Java Wildcards Meet Definition-Site Variance
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Constraint-Based Refactoring with Foresight
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Magda: A New Language for Modularity
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Marco: Safe, Expressive Macros for Any Language
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Practical Permissions for Race-Free Parallelism
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Verification of Snapshot Isolation in Transactional Memory Java Programs
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Scalable Flow-Sensitive Pointer Analysis for Java with Strong Updates
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Application-Only Call Graph Construction
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Program Sliding
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Static Detection of Loop-Invariant Data Structures
Attention for Chapter 12: Pause ’n’ Play: Formalizing Asynchronous C^\sharp
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pause ’n’ Play: Formalizing Asynchronous C^\sharp
Chapter number 12
Book title
ECOOP 2012 – Object-Oriented Programming
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31057-7_12
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-231056-0, 978-3-64-231057-7
Authors

Gavin Bierman, Claudio Russo, Geoffrey Mainland, Erik Meijer, Mads Torgersen, Bierman, Gavin, Russo, Claudio, Mainland, Geoffrey, Meijer, Erik, Torgersen, Mads

Editors

James Noble

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
United Kingdom 1 4%
France 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 19 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 38%
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 92%
Mathematics 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,388,742
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,990
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,771
of 244,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#207
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.