↓ Skip to main content

Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: protocol for systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: protocol for systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0904-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Pillay, Ainsley Moore, Prinon Rahman, Gabriel Lewin, Donna Reynolds, John Riva, Guyléne Thériault, Brett Thombs, Brenda Wilson, Joan Robinson, Amanda Ramdyal, Geneviéve Cadieux, Robin Featherstone, Anne N. Burchell, Jo-Anne Dillon, Ameeta Singh, Tom Wong, Marion Doull, Greg Traversy, Susan Courage, Tara MacGregor, Cydney Johnson, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Hartling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,837,083
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,115
of 437,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#59
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.