↓ Skip to main content

Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: protocol for systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: protocol for systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0904-5
Authors

Jennifer Pillay, Ainsley Moore, Prinon Rahman, Gabriel Lewin, Donna Reynolds, John Riva, Guyléne Thériault, Brett Thombs, Brenda Wilson, Joan Robinson, Amanda Ramdyal, Geneviéve Cadieux, Robin Featherstone, Anne N. Burchell, Jo-Anne Dillon, Ameeta Singh, Tom Wong, Marion Doull, Greg Traversy, Susan Courage, Tara MacGregor, Cydney Johnson, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Hartling

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 9 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,315,825
of 14,064,191 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#584
of 1,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,158
of 367,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#132
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.