↓ Skip to main content

Effect of acute hypoxia on respiratory muscle fatigue in healthy humans

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of acute hypoxia on respiratory muscle fatigue in healthy humans
Published in
Respiratory Research, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-11-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Verges, Damien Bachasson, Bernard Wuyam

Abstract

Greater diaphragm fatigue has been reported after hypoxic versus normoxic exercise, but whether this is due to increased ventilation and therefore work of breathing or reduced blood oxygenation per se remains unclear. Hence, we assessed the effect of different blood oxygenation level on isolated hyperpnoea-induced inspiratory and expiratory muscle fatigue.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 112 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Sports and Recreations 28 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2010.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,216
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,373
of 104,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.