↓ Skip to main content

Newly recognized mosquito-associated viruses in mainland China, in the last two decades

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Newly recognized mosquito-associated viruses in mainland China, in the last two decades
Published in
Virology Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-8-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Liu, Xiaoyan Gao, Guodong Liang

Abstract

There are four principal arboviruses in mainland China. Two kinds of them are mosquito-borne viruses, namely Japanese encephalitis virus and dengue virus, which lead to Japanese encephalitis, and dengue fever/dengue hemorrhagic fever respectively; the other two are tick-borne viruses, namely tick-borne encephalitis virus and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (also known as Xinjiang hemorrhagic fever virus), which contribute to tick-borne encephalitis and Xinjiang hemorrhagic fever respectively. With exception of these four main arboviruses, many other mosquito-associated viruses have been isolated and identified in recent years. These newly isolated and identified mosquito-associated viruses are probably responsible for human and animal infections and diseases. The purpose of this review is to describe the newly isolated mosquito-associated viruses in mainland China which belong to five viral families, including their virological properties, phylogenetic relationships, serological evidence, as well as to appeal the public health concentration worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Senegal 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,862,653
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,467
of 3,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,955
of 185,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#45
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.