↓ Skip to main content

Prospective randomized comparative study between venturi and peristaltic pumps in WhiteStar Signature® phacoemulsification machine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective randomized comparative study between venturi and peristaltic pumps in WhiteStar Signature® phacoemulsification machine
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2018
DOI 10.2147/opth.s177978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilson Takashi Hida, André Lins de Medeiros, André Gustavo de Araújo Rolim, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta, Danilo Varela Kniggendorf, Rodrigo Lafetá Franco de Queiroz, Mário Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves, Pedro Carlos Carricondo, Celso Takashi Nakano, Walton Nosé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Computer Science 2 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,803
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,327
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#47
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.