↓ Skip to main content

Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
citeulike
19 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions
Published in
Genome Biology, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-7-r80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stewart MacArthur, Xiao-Yong Li, Jingyi Li, James B Brown, Hou Cheng Chu, Lucy Zeng, Brandi P Grondona, Aaron Hechmer, Lisa Simirenko, Soile VE Keränen, David W Knowles, Mark Stapleton, Peter Bickel, Mark D Biggin, Michael B Eisen

Abstract

We previously established that six sequence-specific transcription factors that initiate anterior/posterior patterning in Drosophila bind to overlapping sets of thousands of genomic regions in blastoderm embryos. While regions bound at high levels include known and probable functional targets, more poorly bound regions are preferentially associated with housekeeping genes and/or genes not transcribed in the blastoderm, and are frequently found in protein coding sequences or in less conserved non-coding DNA, suggesting that many are likely non-functional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Spain 3 1%
Chile 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 263 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 29%
Researcher 75 26%
Student > Master 23 8%
Professor 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 26 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 172 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 22%
Computer Science 9 3%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 28 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,001
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,796
of 122,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.