↓ Skip to main content

Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
19 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2009
DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-7-r80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stewart MacArthur, Xiao-Yong Li, Jingyi Li, James B Brown, Hou Cheng Chu, Lucy Zeng, Brandi P Grondona, Aaron Hechmer, Lisa Simirenko, Soile VE Keränen, David W Knowles, Mark Stapleton, Peter Bickel, Mark D Biggin, Michael B Eisen

Abstract

We previously established that six sequence-specific transcription factors that initiate anterior/posterior patterning in Drosophila bind to overlapping sets of thousands of genomic regions in blastoderm embryos. While regions bound at high levels include known and probable functional targets, more poorly bound regions are preferentially associated with housekeeping genes and/or genes not transcribed in the blastoderm, and are frequently found in protein coding sequences or in less conserved non-coding DNA, suggesting that many are likely non-functional.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Spain 4 1%
Chile 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 253 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 30%
Researcher 74 26%
Student > Master 22 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 22 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 172 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 21%
Computer Science 9 3%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 23 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#12,600,720
of 20,378,425 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#3,535
of 3,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,741
of 244,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#165
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,378,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.