You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Time for complete transparency about conflicts of interest in public health nutrition research
|
---|---|
Published in |
HRB Open Research, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.12688/hrbopenres.12894.1 |
Authors |
Marita Hennessy, Katherine Cullerton, Phil Baker, Amy Brown, Helen Crawley, Catherine Hayes, Patricia M. Kearney, Colette Kelly, Martin McKee, Melissa Mialon, Mark Petticrew, Patti Rundall, Heather Trickey, Martin White, Sarah Redsell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 46 | 25% |
Ireland | 39 | 21% |
Australia | 13 | 7% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 66 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 100 | 54% |
Scientists | 43 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#379,017
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from HRB Open Research
#3
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,407
of 448,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HRB Open Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.