↓ Skip to main content

Time for complete transparency about conflicts of interest in public health nutrition research

Overview of attention for article published in HRB Open Research, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
185 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time for complete transparency about conflicts of interest in public health nutrition research
Published in
HRB Open Research, January 2019
DOI 10.12688/hrbopenres.12894.1
Authors

Marita Hennessy, Katherine Cullerton, Phil Baker, Amy Brown, Helen Crawley, Catherine Hayes, Patricia M. Kearney, Colette Kelly, Martin McKee, Melissa Mialon, Mark Petticrew, Patti Rundall, Heather Trickey, Martin White, Sarah Redsell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Social Sciences 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#379,017
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from HRB Open Research
#3
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,407
of 448,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HRB Open Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.