↓ Skip to main content

Cyber Literacy for GIScience: Toward Formalizing Geospatial Computing Education

Overview of attention for article published in The Professional Geographer, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 374)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
Title
Cyber Literacy for GIScience: Toward Formalizing Geospatial Computing Education
Published in
The Professional Geographer, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/00330124.2018.1518720
Authors

Eric Shook, Forrest J. Bowlick, Karen K. Kemp, Ola Ahlqvist, Patricia Carbajeles-Dale, David DiBiase, Eun-Kyeong Kim, Scott Lathrop, Britta Ricker, Patrick Rickles, Johnathan Rush, Jennifer N. Swift, Shaowen Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#925,754
of 12,374,243 outputs
Outputs from The Professional Geographer
#17
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,326
of 179,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Professional Geographer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,374,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them