↓ Skip to main content

How curved membranes recruit amphipathic helices and protein anchoring motifs

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemical Biology, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How curved membranes recruit amphipathic helices and protein anchoring motifs
Published in
Nature Chemical Biology, September 2009
DOI 10.1038/nchembio.213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikos S Hatzakis, Vikram K Bhatia, Jannik Larsen, Kenneth L Madsen, Pierre-Yves Bolinger, Andreas H Kunding, John Castillo, Ulrik Gether, Per Hedegård, Dimitrios Stamou

Abstract

Lipids and several specialized proteins are thought to be able to sense the curvature of membranes (MC). Here we used quantitative fluorescence microscopy to measure curvature-selective binding of amphipathic motifs on single liposomes 50-700 nm in diameter. Our results revealed that sensing is predominantly mediated by a higher density of binding sites on curved membranes instead of higher affinity. We proposed a model based on curvature-induced defects in lipid packing that related these findings to lipid sorting and accurately predicted the existence of a new ubiquitous class of curvature sensors: membrane-anchored proteins. The fact that unrelated structural motifs such as alpha-helices and alkyl chains sense MC led us to propose that MC sensing is a generic property of curved membranes rather than a property of the anchoring molecules. We therefore anticipate that MC will promote the redistribution of proteins that are anchored in membranes through other types of hydrophobic moieties.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Germany 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 412 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 139 31%
Researcher 114 25%
Student > Master 33 7%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 6%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 52 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 19%
Chemistry 62 14%
Physics and Astronomy 33 7%
Engineering 17 4%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 62 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemical Biology
#2,663
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,881
of 92,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemical Biology
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.