You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40425-018-0477-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yixin Zhou, Chen Chen, Xuanye Zhang, Sha Fu, Cong Xue, Yuxiang Ma, Wenfeng Fang, Yunpeng Yang, Xue Hou, Yan Huang, Hongyun Zhao, Shaodong Hong, Li Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,237,460
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,111
of 3,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,937
of 447,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#36
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.