↓ Skip to main content

Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
69 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004625.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Lamont, Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, Paul V Beirne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 28 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#204,792
of 14,562,216 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#451
of 11,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,182
of 375,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,562,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.