You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global Conservation Status of Turtles and Tortoises (Order Testudines)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chelonian Conservation & Biology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2744/ccb-1348.1 |
| Authors |
Anders G.J. Rhodin, Craig B. Stanford, Peter Paul Van Dijk, Carla Eisemberg, Luca Luiselli, Russell A. Mittermeier, Rick Hudson, Brian D. Horne, Eric V. Goode, Gerald Kuchling, Andrew Walde, Ernst H.W. Baard, Kristin H. Berry, Albert Bertolero, Torsten E.G. Blanck, Roger Bour, Kurt A. Buhlmann, Linda J. Cayot, Sydney Collett, Andrea Currylow, Indraneil Das, Tomas Diagne, Joshua R. Ennen, Germn Forero-Medina, Matthew G. Frankel, Uwe Fritz, Gerardo Garca, J. Whitfield Gibbons, Paul M. Gibbons, Gong Shiping, Joko Guntoro, Margaretha D. Hofmeyr, John B. Iverson, A. Ross Kiester, Michael Lau, Dwight P. Lawson, Jeffrey E. Lovich, Edward O. Moll, Vivian P. Pez, Rosalinda Palomo-Ramos, Kalyar Platt, Steven G. Platt, Peter C.H. Pritchard, Hugh R. Quinn, Shahriar Caesar Rahman, Soary Tahafe Randrianjafizanaka, Jason Schaffer, Will Selman, H. Bradley Shaffer, Dionysius S.K. Sharma, Shi Haitao, Shailendra Singh, Ricky Spencer, Kahleana Stannard, Sarah Sutcliffe, Scott Thomson, Richard C. Vogt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| Colombia | 7 | 11% |
| Australia | 7 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 2% |
| Honduras | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 67% |
| Scientists | 16 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 228 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 84 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#617,394
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Chelonian Conservation & Biology
#6
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,673
of 445,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chelonian Conservation & Biology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.