↓ Skip to main content

The Political Science 400: With Citation Counts by Cohort, Gender, and Subfield

Overview of attention for article published in PS, Political Science & Politics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 870)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
186 tweeters
Title
The Political Science 400: With Citation Counts by Cohort, Gender, and Subfield
Published in
PS, Political Science & Politics, January 2019
DOI 10.1017/s1049096518001786
Authors

Hannah June Kim, Bernard Grofman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#86,844
of 12,370,185 outputs
Outputs from PS, Political Science & Politics
#12
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,373
of 172,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PS, Political Science & Politics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,370,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.