↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of MOG-antibody titres at first episode to predict the future clinical course in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usefulness of MOG-antibody titres at first episode to predict the future clinical course in adults
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-9160-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alvaro Cobo-Calvo, María Sepúlveda, Hyacintha d’Indy, Thais Armangué, Anne Ruiz, Elisabeth Maillart, Caroline Papeix, Bertrand Audoin, Helene Zephir, Damien Biotti, Jonathan Ciron, Francoise Durand-Dubief, Nicolas Collongues, Xavier Ayrignac, Pierre Labauge, Eric Thouvenot, Alexis Montcuquet, Romain Deschamps, Nuria Solà-Valls, Sara Llufriu, Yolanda Blanco, Jerome de Seze, Sandra Vukusic, Albert Saiz, Romain Marignier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,987,187
of 13,260,816 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,594
of 2,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,551
of 326,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#37
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,260,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,538 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.