You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Usefulness of MOG-antibody titres at first episode to predict the future clinical course in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-018-9160-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alvaro Cobo-Calvo, María Sepúlveda, Hyacintha d’Indy, Thais Armangué, Anne Ruiz, Elisabeth Maillart, Caroline Papeix, Bertrand Audoin, Helene Zephir, Damien Biotti, Jonathan Ciron, Francoise Durand-Dubief, Nicolas Collongues, Xavier Ayrignac, Pierre Labauge, Eric Thouvenot, Alexis Montcuquet, Romain Deschamps, Nuria Solà-Valls, Sara Llufriu, Yolanda Blanco, Jerome de Seze, Sandra Vukusic, Albert Saiz, Romain Marignier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,200,664
of 23,884,161 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,426
of 4,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,964
of 444,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#53
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.