You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geodiversity and geoheritage: Detecting scientific and geographic biases and gaps through a bibliometric study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.443 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan-José Ibáñez, Eric C. Brevik, Artemi Cerdà |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 27 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,333,689
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#9,023
of 25,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,533
of 351,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#330
of 830 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 830 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.