↓ Skip to main content

Evidence on point-of-care diagnostics for assessment of nutritional biochemical markers as an integral part of maternal services in low- and middle-income countries: systematic scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence on point-of-care diagnostics for assessment of nutritional biochemical markers as an integral part of maternal services in low- and middle-income countries: systematic scoping review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0932-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. S. Dhlamini, D. Kuupiel, T. P. Mashamba-Thompson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,599,042
of 14,110,318 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#855
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,706
of 368,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#182
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.