↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care versus standard care for people with schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
120 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care versus standard care for people with schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007964.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Jones, David Hacker, Jun Xia, Alan Meaden, Claire B Irving, Sai Zhao, Jue Chen, Chunhu Shi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 22 28%
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 26 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Psychology 10 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2019.
All research outputs
#201,568
of 13,616,773 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#476
of 10,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,582
of 343,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,616,773 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.