↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced balance associated with coordination training with stochastic resonance stimulation in subjects with functional ankle instability: an experimental trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhanced balance associated with coordination training with stochastic resonance stimulation in subjects with functional ankle instability: an experimental trial
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2007
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-4-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott E Ross, Brent L Arnold, J Troy Blackburn, Cathleen N Brown, Kevin M Guskiewicz

Abstract

Ankle sprains are common injuries that often lead to functional ankle instability (FAI), which is a pathology defined by sensations of instability at the ankle and recurrent ankle sprain injury. Poor postural stability has been associated with FAI, and sports medicine clinicians rehabilitate balance deficits to prevent ankle sprains. Subsensory electrical noise known as stochastic resonance (SR) stimulation has been used in conjunction with coordination training to improve dynamic postural instabilities associated with FAI. However, unlike static postural deficits, dynamic impairments have not been indicative of ankle sprain injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of coordination training with or without SR stimulation on static postural stability. Improving postural instabilities associated with FAI has implications for increasing ankle joint stability and decreasing recurrent ankle sprains.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 221 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Student > Bachelor 42 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 30%
Sports and Recreations 40 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 13%
Engineering 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2008.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#831
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,615
of 143,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.