↓ Skip to main content

Tweeting the Meeting

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tweeting the Meeting
Published in
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, November 2018
DOI 10.1161/circoutcomes.118.005018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T. Tanoue, Dhananjay Chatterjee, Heajung L. Nguyen, Troy Sekimura, Brian H. West, David Elashoff, William H. Suh, Janet K. Han

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,523,598
of 12,477,106 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#830
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,779
of 236,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,477,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.