↓ Skip to main content

Mapping variation in intervention design: a systematic review to develop a program theory for patient navigator programs

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping variation in intervention design: a systematic review to develop a program theory for patient navigator programs
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0920-5
Authors

Laura Desveaux, Kerry McBrien, Lianne Barnieh, Noah M. Ivers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 4 33%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,809,892
of 15,045,928 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#713
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,677
of 378,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#166
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,045,928 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.