You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Invisible nuclear-armed submarines, or transparent oceans? Are ballistic missile submarines still the best deterrent for the United States?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1080/00963402.2019.1555998 |
Authors |
Owen R. Cote |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 33% |
Australia | 4 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 65% |
Scientists | 11 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 44% |
Computer Science | 2 | 22% |
Mathematics | 1 | 11% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#768,313
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#119
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,016
of 447,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.