↓ Skip to main content

Invisible nuclear-armed submarines, or transparent oceans? Are ballistic missile submarines still the best deterrent for the United States?

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
56 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Invisible nuclear-armed submarines, or transparent oceans? Are ballistic missile submarines still the best deterrent for the United States?
Published in
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2019.1555998
Authors

Owen R. Cote

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 40%
Decision Sciences 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#331,376
of 13,232,346 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#82
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,501
of 325,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them