↓ Skip to main content

French nuclear forces, 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
Title
French nuclear forces, 2019
Published in
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2019.1556003
Authors

Hans M. Kristensen, Matt Korda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#473,974
of 12,385,603 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#133
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,863
of 178,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,385,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them